Cricket South Africa and PitchVision Cricket Technology have revealed the ball tracking technology behind their countrywide talent identification programme.

 Centurion Mall, Pretoria was the venue for an event to unveil how PV/ONE coaching systems will be rolled out across 20 South African provincial academies. The technology, that can be used in any net, allows coaches and players to track their performance from bowling pace and accuracy through to video analysis of technique.

PitchVision is the official coach education partner to CSA. Formed in 2005, the company have supplied systems to CSA with the aim of helping identify and nurture talented cricketers across the nation.

 “It is the evolution of cricket,” said Craig van Dyk, Director of PitchVision SA. “The world is in the grips of a Technological Revolution and we are merely bringing this into cricket. Our aim is to take this technology to all levels of the game”

“With more and more young South Africans starting to play cricket as early as 5 years old we need to ensure that the talented ones are identified as early as possible and coached properly so as not to pick up bad habits which are often difficult to change.”

Cricket South Africa’s General Manager: Cricket, Corrie van Zyl, said

“Coaching education is a vital part of ensuring that we have a pipeline that continues to produce talent at all levels. With the additional investment and commitment from PitchVision, we are able to place greater emphasis on our coaching education programmes and look forward to upskilling our coaches,”

Press and other invited dignitaries attended the event to get more information. The venue is also the site of South Africa's first cricket simulator, PitchVision PowerPlay, where anyone can try their luck batting against world-class bowlers like Jaques Kallis and Jimmy Anderson.

From serious talent to serious fun, PitchVision provides the best cricket technology.

The best batters in the world have excellent back foot games when playing on spinning tracks.

AB de Villiers, Yonus Khan, Rahul Dravid and Joe Root all get as far away from ball bounce when the bowler misses his length on the short side.

This depth of crease gives the player more time and creates different options to access with scoring shots.

These players are masters of manoeuvring the ball, even on the driest pitches at the end of a five day Test match. And if the bowler misses their length by a sufficient margin, the batter will be able to back foot punch or pull the ball away for boundaries also.

Sub-continent batting

Traditionally, northern hemisphere batters have developed lazy habits as the ball generally sits in the wicket and doesn’t spin significantly on greener surfaces.

As a result, they tend to shift their weight backwards rather than create distance between ball bounce and ball contact.

This approach works until the ball starts to spin quickly or break a bigger distance off the pitch.

That’s why Westerners have now learnt from the sub-continent players who have fast feet. I analysed these movements and now coach players to copy sub-continent approaches.

Even if the player is never likely to play in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh or Pakistan.

You see, the “northern approach” is simply not transferable to wickets that really spin. The sub-continental approach will thrive in any cricket environment.

More time. More options. That works everywhere.

Different lines of movement

So, depth of movement is one thing. Now here are two methods of playing back foot to to the same bowler.

England’s Michael Vaughan and Paul Collingwood would practice to face Murilitheran using as much depth of crease as possible.

Where they differed was their angle of movement.

Colly would move back and towards leg stump with the intention of hitting the ball with a punch drive through extra cover. He would aim to score 2’s into that often vacant gap. If he timed the ball beautifully then he would pick up a boundary.

Now in truth, it would be fair to say that Colly didn’t always pick Murili -not many batters did!

So this method gave Colly the chance to get away from his slightly under-pitched ball and play him off the pitch.

If the ball turned in then he could hit back into the spin with a safe punch drive and if it turned away then he could use the width as well as his short punch through the ball to generate speed off the bat.

Vaughan was different.

He would push into off stump and look to clip the ball through mid wicket with his excellent wrists. KP did the same (when he wasn’t switch-hitting).

Vaughany would use the spin on the off break to help him access open spaces beyond short leg and defend the ball if it was Murili’s doosra.

The boys practiced their own movements and approaches religiously.

And whilst neither mastered Murili in his own backyard of Kandy and Columbo, they were able to put the great man under some degree of pressure through their excellent footwork options.

So, depth of crease is important: It’s a given against spin nowadays but now you have two movement options to practice.

By doing so, you can find out which one is your preference

Then also experiment to see if there would be a circumstance or a challenge that may lend itself to adopting the other method rather than your preferred choice.

Give them both a go and come back to me with your follow up questions and experiences.