If you do need eyewear, which pair is best for you?
Why do you need sunglasses for cricket?
You can't watch a first class or international cricket match these days without seeing several pairs of Oakley M-Frames scattered on the player's heads. The professionals have good reason to wear high quality sunglasses: Protection.
Modern sport shades offer protection against harmful UV light. For players spending several days a week in the field at the height of summer this is essential. UV protection can help prevent cataracts, cancer and other eye damage.
While you may not spend as long in the sun as a professional a pair of UV protective glasses can do the same for you.
- Protect from impact eye injuries, especially for higher risk fielding positions like wicketkeeper and short leg.
- Polarised glasses reduce glare, stopping you from squinting.
- Prescription lenses can reduce blur, which has been proven to reduce performance in ball sports
- Some models can enhance red colour against green background, making it easier to pick up the ball.
It's worth noting that dress/street sunglasses offer good UV protection but are dangerous to wear on the pitch as they are not designed to stay on under pressure. They also are more likely to shatter on impact. Stay away from them and stick to a sports pair.
So, if you play cricket regularly it makes sense to wear sports sunglasses because they protect your eyes. If you take that as an essential element, it raises another question.
Will wearing the wrong sunglasses reduce your performance?
There is a massive disparity in prices between makes and models of sports eyewear despite offering UV and impact protection of roughly equal levels.
Some of it is branding but according to leading manufacturer Oakley, lens quality is a major difference. In other words, cheaper lenses distort your viewing clarity.
There is no doubt that blurring is an issue. In a 2003 study, tennis players who had their eyes artificially blurred saw a 25% drop in performance. No study has been done on cricket as far as I know, but it's safe to assume roughly similar results.
Even top of the range shades will blur a little compared to the naked eye, so there is always some compromise.
Research by Oakley shows how the expensive Oakley lenses make a significant difference to clarity, distortion and eyestrain compared to other makes. It's important to take these results with a pinch of salt. After all, Oakley is hardly going to make their product look bad or go out of their way to highlight cheaper lenses that perform just as well.
That said, most people I have spoken to personally who own Oakley frames sing their praises from on high. There is certainly plenty of anecdotal evidence to back the manufacturer's claims.
Whether the claims are true or not, are cheaper lenses so poor as to hurt performance?
The jury is still out on that one, as no research has been done.
What sunglasses are best for cricket?
I would recommend some form of eyewear for all cricketers for UV ray protection. If you go with cheaper lenses you may find a compromise on clarity, although it's unclear if this enough to reduce performance.
That means, if you can afford them, Oakley glasses seem to be the best for cricketers.
There is also a large selection of lens types for different conditions. In general the best choices for cricket are:
- G26. Which are designed for target shooting and enhance reds and oranges against greens and blues. They are not quite as effective in very bright light.
- G30 or VR28. For sunny conditions. Reduces glare and enhances colour perception.
What are your experiences with Oakley and other models? Leave a comment and let the world know.