Experts agree: exercise doesn't work for cricket | Cricket coaching, fitness and tips

Experts agree: exercise doesn't work for cricket

Filed in:

In the last few days, three giants in their fields all made statements about the role of exercise that put together couldn't be ignored.

First, batting great Geoff Boycott found himself agreeing that training in the gym is too disconnected from playing cricket to be effective.

Then strength coach Vern Gambetta said: "I can’t believe how many strength coaches hang out the weight room waiting for practice to end so they can do their job. Then they have the players go through a weight workout that has no relationship to what just happened on the field."

Which is pretty much the same thing: There are fewer crossovers in weight training than we think.

But the final nail in the coffin of current training methods came from Dr. John Berardi on his site:

"These data came in the form of a study I recently worked on at the University of Texas.

In this study, nearly 100 initially sedentary participants either stayed sedentary (about half of them) OR began exercising (the other half). They exercisers were given a program to follow that added up to about 5 1/2 to 6 hours of activity per week and that lasted for a total of 12 weeks. The non-exercisers did nothing for the 12 weeks except show up for measurement sessions.

I was shocked to find that even with 3+ hours of training per week with a weightlifting coach and 2+ hours of training per week with a body-weight circuit instructor didn't really work. The formerly sedentary participants didn't do much better than their couch-sitting counterparts.

That's right, without dietary control, 12 weeks of high intensity training produced a fairly disappointing 1% loss of body fat. In terms of raw data, the participants lost only 1 pound of fat and gained 2 pounds of lean vs. the placebo group.

Frankly, that sucks."

Exercise be damned?
 
What's the conclusion? It's damning stuff:
 
  • Top players, former players and coaches don't see a connection between exercise and cricket performance.
  • Research has show exercise alone makes only very small differences to all important body composition.

So should we all give up with this exercise lark and start playing more cricket instead?

It's not as easy as that.

The problem is that it's easy to put different parts of our lives into handy boxes: When you are in the gym you are strength training and when you are playing cricket you are a cricketer.  But these elements are intertwined together.

Training remains important for injury prevention and performance reasons, it just has to be the right sort of training: That with the most crossover to the field (commonly known as functional training).

Good functional training must be combined with effective nutrition, enough sleep and control of stress both in life and on the pitch. You body and mind is a complete system and need to be treated as such if you are going to get the best from yourself.

That's why Boycott, Gambetta and Berardi (all experts in their particular fields) all find the same conclusions from different angles.

But as they go on to say: If you put it all together better, including exercise, you become a superstar.

Are you putting it altogether?

Photo Credit: gin soak

Broadcast Your Cricket Matches!

Ever wanted your skills to be shown to the world? PV/MATCH is the revolutionary product for cricket clubs and schools to stream matches, upload HD highlights instantly to Twitter and Facebook and make you a hero!

PV/MATCH let's you score the game, record video of each ball, share it and use the outcomes to take to training and improve you further.

Click here for details.

Comments

This is a misleading article. Gambetta is notorious of spewing out nonsense like this. Why should anything you do in the weight room mimic your sport movement? Weight training is a general stimulus !!! And it appears that Boycott has no clue either of what is correct weight training. Correct training is about selecting whole body compound exercises and designing an effective program. Nutrition is important but Berardi talks crap at times. Ask Lyle Mcdonald. How can Berardi say there was no change? Heck the people who trained will be stronger than the sedentary group. Body fat measurement is not the only thing to look at. All 3 are making statements based on their own assumptions.

Wow that riled you up!

So are you saying we should ignore what these people say because they are discredited as experts? Seeing as Gambetta, Boycott and Berardi are saying training and diet is still important despite their observations, I wonder if we should be so quick to discredit them? Food for thought.

Experts or not, these guys are getting their panties in a twist. Their comments are misleading for green horns and it is irresponsible to make up such a misleading article.

What is misleading about the article trainer?

As physical fitness has only really risen to prominence in the modern game, i feel that Boycott is not the man to listen to on this subject, as it is after his time. However, the training cricketers do should be specific to the game, unless they are base building.

I think what Boycott was saying there is too much emphasis on the wrong sort of training for many players. That's the point I was trying to make (albeit with a slightly baiting title)